As the Quo Warranto petition filed by Solicitor General Jose Calida continues to hog the limelight, there has been a lot of fake news circulating online regarding the reason why the petition was filed. Lawyer Trixie Cruz-Angeles, the other half of the FB Page Luminous by Trixie Cruz-Angeles & Ahmed Paglinawan has taken to Facebook to shed light on the issue. Angeles used Tagalog as medium to reach out to as many Filipinos as she can, to stop the wrong information from dominating the narrative and putting President Duterte and his administration in a bad light. Angeles began by politely

(0 comment)

Radio host Mark Lopez explained on Facebook the quo warranto case filed by SolGen Jose Calida at the Supreme Court against ABS-CBN by drawing a comparison to Lourdes Sereno case and annulment of marriage. But before doing so, Lopez defined what us QUO WARRANTO and why SolGen Calida filed the case vs. ABS-CBN. According to Lopez, QUO WARRANTO is latin for “BY WHAT AUTHORITY…” Lopez said when talking about quo warranto, the main talking point here is the legal personality or authority of an individual or franchise. Lopez cited the example of the quo warranto case filed by SolGen Calida

(0 comment)

As criticism mounts against SolGen Jose Calida for receiving excess allowances that runs into millions, social media blogger Krizette Laureta Chu dares critics to join her in sending the SolGen to prison. However, there is a catch. Chu also wants critics to send Calida’s predecessor Florin Hilbay to prison, whom she said is equally guilty as Calida. Dali, ipakulong natin si Calida for getting excess allowances. Idamay na natin si Florin Hilbay, his predecessor, who also got excess allowances. “Solicitor General Jose Calida and his predecessor, Florin Hilbay, received millions of pesos in “excess” allowances in 2016, according to a

(0 comment)